Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Essay Topic:
James Scott argues that the weapons of the weak can be seen as a “social movement with no formal organization, no manifestoes, no dues, no name, and no banner” (p.35).
Do you agree or disagree with his claim? Support your argument with robust evidence from other chapters in Scott’s book and at least 5 additional sources beyond syllabus readings
Intro: thesis statement (your answer in a nutshell) and preview of what evidence you will use to support argument
Part I: What is a classic social movement + evidence
Part II: What are the weapons of the weak + evidence
Part III: Why weapons of the weak constitutes or does not constitute a social movement + evidence. This part should be the “meat” of your essay.
Conclusion: re-state your thesis statement, recap your arguments and evidence, a strong closing statement.
The 6 sources have to come from the university library. I will provide the credentials to access it.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now