Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Unit 2 Discussion – Ethical Implications & Correlations
No unread replies.No replies.
Discussion: Unit 2, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT
Ethical Implications & Correlations
Instructions
It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however should be correlated to the literature.All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.
Initial Response: Unit 2, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT
Instructions:
Choose 1 country to research and analyze the available information about a ethical correlations related to a selected health threat or disease.
Summarize the disease and health threat conditions for this country.
Summarize the primary health threats, such as: economic, environmental, geographic, political, religious, and cultural influences.
Summarize ethical correlations and implications of the issue selected. For example, are current policies ineffective because they are disproportionately providing coverage to segregated members of the population? Are available treatment options impacted by socioeconomic status?
List at least 3 questions that you would like more information on before you make a recommendation on those potential ways to solve the health threats for this country.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
The post and responses are valued at 40 points. Please review post and response expectations. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Peer Response: Unit 2, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Ethical Implications & Correlations
Instructions:
Please respond to a minimum of two peers. Include in your response:
Compare the work that you did in your original post with the analysis of at least 2 of your peers.
What did you find to be similar?
What did you find to be different?
In what ways do you agree with your peers’ analysis of the health threats and why?
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Estimated time to complete: 1 hour
No unread replies.No replies.
Discussion: Unit 2, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT
Ethical Implications & Correlations
Instructions
It is anticipated that the initial discussion post should be in the range of 250-300 words. Response posts to peers have no minimum word requirement but must demonstrate topic knowledge and scholarly engagement with peers. Substantive content is imperative for all posts. All discussion prompt elements for the topic must be addressed. Please proofread your response carefully for grammar and spelling. Do not upload any attachments unless specified in the instructions. All posts should be supported by a minimum of one scholarly resource, ideally within the last 5 years. Journals and websites must be cited appropriately. Citations and references must adhere to APA format.
Classroom Participation
Students are expected to address the initial discussion question by Wednesday of each week. Participation in the discussion forum requires a minimum of three (3) substantive postings (this includes your initial post and posting to two peers) on three (3) different days. Substantive means that you add something new to the discussion supported with citation(s) and reference(s), you are not just agreeing. This is also a time to ask questions or offer information surrounding the topic addressed by your peers. Personal experience is appropriate for a substantive discussion, however should be correlated to the literature.All discussion boards will be evaluated utilizing rubric criterion inclusive of content, analysis, collaboration, writing and APA. If you fail to post an initial discussion or initial discussion is late, you will not receive points for content and analysis, you may however post to your peers for partial credit following the guidelines above.
Initial Response: Unit 2, Due Wednesday by 11:59 pm CT
Instructions:
Choose 1 country to research and analyze the available information about a ethical correlations related to a selected health threat or disease.
Summarize the disease and health threat conditions for this country.
Summarize the primary health threats, such as: economic, environmental, geographic, political, religious, and cultural influences.
Summarize ethical correlations and implications of the issue selected. For example, are current policies ineffective because they are disproportionately providing coverage to segregated members of the population? Are available treatment options impacted by socioeconomic status?
List at least 3 questions that you would like more information on before you make a recommendation on those potential ways to solve the health threats for this country.
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
The post and responses are valued at 40 points. Please review post and response expectations. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 hours
Peer Response: Unit 2, Due Sunday by 11:59 pm CT
Ethical Implications & Correlations
Instructions:
Please respond to a minimum of two peers. Include in your response:
Compare the work that you did in your original post with the analysis of at least 2 of your peers.
What did you find to be similar?
What did you find to be different?
In what ways do you agree with your peers’ analysis of the health threats and why?
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Estimated time to complete: 1 hour

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now