Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

The purpose of this assignment is to get you thinking (and writing) critically. “Critical Thinking” is defined as the objective analysis and evaluation of an issue in order to form a judgment. It is the basis for the study of law and will be essential for you as business leaders.
For this assignment you will select one form of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) from Chapter 4, defining and explaining it. If you can use an example from your own personal life or company policy, even better. You should discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the ADR you choose, how you think it fits into our current system of justice, and why you would advise a company to use this form of ADR. Finally, you should also discuss what would you advise a company if litigation seemed inevitable. You should make sure the reader is left with a clear takeaway from your discussion.
Below are the expectations for this assignment.
This is not a book report, but an objective analysis and evaluation of the form of ADR you chose and why a company uses it or should consider it.
2-3 pages of body, cover page is not necessary.
Citation of any references used, giving credit where credit is due. The references must be clearly cited within the body of your paper.
Reference page attached, if use any

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now